A critical look at MOOCs
|Title||A critical look at MOOCs|
|Publication Type||Book Chapter|
|Year of Publication||2016|
|Authors||Spector, M. J.|
|Editors||Jemni, M., Kinshuk, & Khribi M. K.|
|Publisher||Open education: From OERs to MOOCs|
|Series Title||Lecture Notes in Educational Technology|
|Secondary Publisher||Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg|
|ISBN Number||Hardcover 978-3-662-52923-2|
|Keywords||distance education, dynamic feedback, formative feedback, MOOCs|
Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are offered online to anyone who registers. There are no requirements to register and for those not wishing to receive course credit or a certificate indicating successful completion, there are no charges to enroll. As a result, enrollments can reach into the thousands. MOOCs are a recent twenty-first century phenomenon that emerged from the open educational resources movement and a course entitled “Connectivism and Connective Knowledge” offered in 2008 by George Siemens and Stephen Downes. There were a small number of students at the University of Manitoba who paid tuition and several thousand others who simply participated in the online course environment at no cost. Given the subject (connectivism) of that early MOOC and the fact that those not paying were there as part of an extended community gathered around the subject of the course, it is reasonable to conclude that the ‘C’ in MOOC stood for ‘course’ for registered participants and ‘community’ for those not registered. Since 2008, MOOCs have appeared in many places and have taken many forms. This chapter examines the growth of MOOCs and the roles that they can play in the context of learning and instruction. The argument herein is that it is a mistake to consider current MOOCs to be a new form of a distance learning course. Rather, current MOOCs should be viewed and evaluated not as courses but as communities of subject-specific participants.
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
From the Atlantic: Academics Want You to Read Their Work for Free. Publishing an open-access paper in a journal can be prohibitively expensive. Some researchers are drumming up support for a movement to change that.
See the Florida Virtual University's 2016 Student Textbook and Course Materials Survey with responses from 22,000 students.
The curricula provider Great Minds is suing FedEx in New York City federal court, arguing that the delivery, printing and photocopying company should compensate the educational organization for the money FedEx makes from requests from schools to copy materials that Great Minds created and makes available for free, on an open license.