Scientific publishing is a rip-off. We fund the research – it should be free
| Title | Scientific publishing is a rip-off. We fund the research – it should be free |
| Publication Type | Newspaper Article |
| Year of Publication | 2018 |
| Authors | Monbiot, G. |
| Publisher | The Guardian |
| Section | Opinion: Peer review and scientific publishing |
| Frequency | daily |
| Edition | Thu 13 Sep 2018 06.00 BST |
| Date Published | 09/2018 |
| Keywords | academic publishing, business model, copyright infringement, monopoly, paywalls, pirated articles, research publishing system, Robert Maxwell, Sci Hub |
| Abstract | Those who take on the global industry that traps research behind paywalls are heroes, not thieves. |
| URL | https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/sep/13/scientific-publishing-rip-off-taxpayers-fund-research |
| Rights | © 2018 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. |
| Refereed Designation | Does Not Apply |
Announcements
Read from the Guardian, Scientific publishing is a rip-off. We fund the research – it should be free
Here are Peter Suber's Thoughts on Plan S
From Science Europe, read cOAlition S: Making Open Access a reality by 2020: A declaration of commitment by public research funders. Also read the SPARC article, New coalition of European funders join together to place unprecedented mandate on researchers to publish OA.
The OER Champion Playbook is a living document offering ideas for advocating OER adoption.
Read The fabrication that is over from Half an Hour.
Contact North/Contact Nord has released Ten facts about Open Educational Resources (OER)
