The OER Knowledge Cloud: Why All Self Respecting Economists Should Support Open Textbooks

Why all self respecting economists should support open textbooks

Published	January 2014
Periodical	Volume 2014, Pages blog- January 14th, 2014
Publisher	Innovation Memes

ABSTRACT

As the title suggests, this post makes the theoretical case for treating online textbooks as a public good, which means that some combination of government and non-profit funding should be used to fund the development and maintenance of open textbooks.

Keywords

Other number	December 9th, 2014
Refereed	Does not apply
URL	http://innovationmemes.blogspot.com/2014/01/why-all-self-respecting-economists.html
Access date	December 9th, 2014
Export options	BibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar

Viewed by 116 distinct readers

CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS

The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.

Click a star to be the first to rate this document

▶ POST A COMMENT

Beshears, Fred

This one starts with the assumption that high quality, open, online textbooks are already available. It then points out that since faculty don't have to pay for the textbooks they select for their courses, they don't ...

Match: Beshears, Fred; libraries; open textbooks

OER in context: Reforming the textbook market and higher education

Beshears, Fred

Here are descriptions of and links to a few of my blog posts on Open Educational Resources (OER). Many also discuss OER in the context of reforming both the textbook market and traditional institutions of higher ...

Match: Beshears, Fred; open textbooks

David L. Kirp on the British Open University

Beshears, Fred

This is an extended quote from a book by UC Berkeley Professor David Kirp. It provides an excellent description of the team-based approach the OU UK uses to develop their online courses.

Match: Beshears, Fred; open textbooks

The case for Creative Commons textbooks

Beshears, Fred

This is an article I wrote back in 2005. It starts with a discussion of the high cost of textbooks ($900/year per student), and then considers a very novel idea for financing an open alternative to commercial textbooks. ...

Match: Beshears, Fred; open textbooks

The evolving economics of educational materials and Open Educational Resources: Toward closer alignment with the core values of education

Wiley, David

Introduction Last year Bob Reiser invited me to contribute a chapter to the fourth edition of Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology, to be published by Pearson. I agreed on the conditions that I would ...

Match: copyright; open textbooks

Education ministers’ policy statement on fair dealing

CMEC Copyright Consortium

The Statement underlines the provincial and territorial education ministers' support for teachers' and students' use of the fair dealing provision in the Copyright Act for classroom learning. The consortium is composed ...

Match: copyright; open textbooks

#GoOpen district launch packet

U.S. Department of Education

Across the country, districts are choosing to #GoOpen and transitioning to the use of openly licensed educational resources to improve student learning in their schools. Openly licensed educational resources enable ...

Match: copyright; open textbooks

#GoOpen district launch packet (Version 1.3)

U.S. Department of Education

Match: copyright; open textbooks

A report on the re-use and adaptation of Open Educational Resources (OER): An exploration of technologies available

Abeywardena, Ishan Sudeera

Open Educational Resources (OER) are a relatively new phenomenon which is fast gaining academic credibility as well as the attention of policy makers on a global scale. With increased funding by governmental and ...

Match: copyright

An alternative publishing model for academic textbook authors: Open education and writing commons

Moxley, Joe

Rather than assigning copyright to traditional or even nontraditional publishers for 5 to 15% of royalties, faculty can be their own publishers and own all of their materials – subject to institutional copyright ...