The OER Knowledge Cloud makes use of cookies. By continuing, you consent to this use. More information.
A small project and a big venture: Sharing practices between two different scale OER developments
Connolly, Teresa · Lane, Andrew · Hasseler, Bjorn · Hennesy, Sarah

PublishedMarch 2013
ConferenceOER13: Creating a Virtuous Circle

ABSTRACT
Sharing knowledge between OER initiatives and the reality of what actually happens in practice can lead to the fostering of openness amongst yet further initiatives and consequently enable our communities of practice to grow (Lane and Darby, 2012). Such knowledge sharing and learning of valuable lessons involves OER projects both large and small; projects ranging from those involving a few individuals, to those based in departments, and covering discipline areas as well as those that have arisen as a result of large institutional OER investments. This paper sets out to offer insight into, and contrast, the practices and knowledge sharing of two very different UK based OER projects: the internationally recognised OpenLearn project (McAndrew et al, 2009), established by the Open University in 2006 and the smaller scale Open Resource Bank for Interactive Teaching (ORBIT) project established at the University of Cambridge in 2012 (Hassler at al, 2012). In turn it highlights the other initiatives that informed or were informed by these two projects.

On the one hand we provide a direct comparison between OpenLearn, established at a University as a big institutional approach and aiming to reach a broad academic audience, with ORBIT, developed as a small specialised project within a Faculty of Education and focused on a more targeted audience: that of primary and secondary school teachers of mathematics and science, and teacher educators in those areas. On the other hand we set out the expectations of the principal stakeholders - learners and educators – as well as mapping out the wide range of other projects and initiatives that they shared knowledge with and vice versa. If we are to understand and facilitate the spread of open practice, it is important to examine the knowledge sharing practices and approaches of both smallscale and large-scale ventures as well as the role of knowledge brokers.

Time point 0:30:00 - 0:54:00

Keywords communities of practice · knowledge brokers · knowledge sharing practices · open education practice (OEP)

Languageen
URLhttp://uilapech01.nottingham.ac.uk:8080/ess/echo/presentation/b3d14f42-9cd9-4d11-9ef2-826ed7e5269c
Export optionsBibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar


Viewed by 49 distinct readers




CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS

The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.

Click a star to be the first to rate this document


POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS

OERopoly: Collaborative learning about Open Educational Resources through game-playing
Connolly, Teresa; Connolly, Teresa; Okada, Alexandra; Scott, Peter J.
The Open Educational Resources (OER) community supports the belief that knowledge is a public good and, combined with technological advancement, can provide an extraordinary opportunity to help equalize the distribution ...
Match: Connolly, Teresa

Connected: Online mentoring in Facebook for final year digital media students
McCarthy, Josh; Okada, Alexandra; Connolly, Teresa; Peters, Scott
This study explores the efficacy of open educational resources and online social network sites in linking digital media students with industry through an e-mentoring scheme, to enhance employment prospects and promote ...
Match: Connolly, Teresa

OpenLearn research report 2006-2008
McAndrew, Patrick; Santos, A.; Lane, Andy; Godwin, Stephen; et al.
This report takes the experience of OpenLearn over its two-years of operation to reflect on what it means to offer free resources and the issues that we have been able to explore and learn from. The structure of the ...
Match: Connolly, Teresa

Towards a social learning space for Open Educational Resources
Ferguson, Rebecca; Buckingham Shum, Simon; Connolly, Teresa; Scott, Peter J.; Okada, Alexandra
This chapter examines the meaning of “open” in terms of tools, resources, and education, and goes on to explore the association between open approaches to education and the development of online social learning. It ...
Match: Connolly, Teresa

Case Study 3: Exploring Open Educational Resources for informal learning
Alexander Mikroyannidis; Connolly, Teresa; Kroop, Sylvana; Mikroyannidis, Alexander; Wolpers, Martin
This chapter explores the potential of informal learning within a Personal Learning Environment (PLE), as well as the identified informal learning cultures that have evolved from the use of Open Educational Resources ...
Match: Connolly, Teresa

Crowdsourcing education on the web: A role-based analysis of online learning communities
Corneli, Joseph; Mikroyannidis, Alexander; Scott, Peter J.; Connolly, Teresa; Okada, Alexandra
Learning online has significantly evolved over the past decade due to the emergence of Web 2.0 and 3.0 technologies that facilitate social learning in adaptive online environments. The open content movement and the ...
Match: Connolly, Teresa

Visualization mapping approaches for developing and understanding OER
Connolly, Teresa
Open educational resources (OER) can be described in numerous ways (Creative Commons, 2012). In this visualization based context, however, OER can be defined as …teaching, learning and research resources that reside ...
Match: Connolly, Teresa

Knowledge sharing and collaboration as indicators of learning in OER communities
Petrides, Lisa; Jimes, Cynthia; Hedgspeth, Carol; Connolly, Teresa; et al.
This work specifically sheds light on the ways that OER impacts teacher professional development, knowledge building, and interactive problem solving around teaching practice. Drawing on key findings from several ...
Match: Connolly, Teresa

Fostering OER communities of practice with teachers
Fulantelli, Giovanni; Taibi, Davide; Gentile, Manuel; Allegra, Mario; et al.
The focus of this chapter is on “key issues for fostering OER communities of practice with teachers.” It is based on the successful experiences of three European funded projects: SLOOP, TENEGEN, and SLOOP2DESC. ...
Match: Connolly, Teresa

Web 2.0 open remote and virtual laboratories in engineering education
Salzmann, Christophe; Gillet, Denis; Esquembre, Francisco; Vargas, Héctor; et al.
This chapter presents challenges in deploying remote and virtual laboratories as open educational resources with application to engineering education, as well as current trends in using Web 2.0 technologies to enable ...
Match: Connolly, Teresa