Knowledge typologies for professional learning: Educators’ (re)generation of knowledge when learning open educational practice
| Published | December 2017 |
| Journal | Educational Technology Research and Development Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages 1583 - 1604 |
ABSTRACT
Open education resources (OER) and accompanying open education practices(OEP), are changing the education landscape. For educators to take full advantage of the opportunities OER offer they must engage in learning activities to facilitate the extension and adaption of their practice. This paper forms part of a larger study exploring how adult educators learn from and through their engagement with OER in the contexts of their work.Following a quantitative investigation of the learning behaviours of 521 educators around OER use, follow up interviews were conducted with 30 participants. The interviews explore in greater detail the ways knowledge is being (re)generated and used by the educators as they learn new practices with and through OER. Six broad knowledge types were identified as supporting the expansion of practice. The data suggest educators not only require multiple types of knowledge, but also must be able to move fluidly among these different types of knowledge.| Keywords | higher education · knowledge building · open education practice · open education resources · professional learning |
| ISSN | 1556-6501 |
| Refereed | Yes |
| Rights | © Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2017 |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11423-017-9536-z |
| URL | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11423-017-9536-z |
| Other information | Education Tech Research Dev |
| Export options | BibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar |
Viewed by 121 distinct readers
CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS
The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.
Click a star to be the first to rate this document
▶ POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS
Massive numbers, diverse learning
Littlejohn, Allison; Hood, Nina
MOOCs provide education for millions of people worldwide. Though it is not clear whether everyone can learn in a MOOC. Building on the typology of MOOC participants introduced is in Chap. 3 , and we explore the claim ...
Match: Hood, Nina; Littlejohn, Allison
The [un]democratisation of education and learning
Littlejohn, Allison; Hood, Nina
MOOCs have engendered excitement around their potential to democratise education. They appear to act as a leveller and offer equal opportunity to millions of learners worldwide. Yet, this alluring promise is not wholly ...
Match: Hood, Nina; Littlejohn, Allison
The emancipated learner? The tensions facing learners in massive, open learning
Littlejohn, Allison; Hood, Nina
MOOCs have the potential to challenge existing educational models. Paradoxically, they frequently reinforce educational conventions by requiring the learners to conform to expected norms of current educational models. ...
Match: Hood, Nina; Littlejohn, Allison
Designing for quality?
Littlejohn, Allison; Hood, Nina
There are significant complexities in interpreting and measuring quality in MOOCs. In this chapter, we examine experts' perceptions of how to measure quality in MOOCs, using empirical data we gathered through ...
Match: Hood, Nina; Littlejohn, Allison
MOOC Quality: The need for new measures
Hood, Nina; Littlejohn, Allison
MOOCs are re-operationalising traditional concepts in education. While they draw on elements of existing educational and learning models, they represent a new approach to instruction and learning. The challenges MOOCs ...
Match: Hood, Nina; Littlejohn, Allison
The many guises of MOOCs
Littlejohn, Allison; Hood, Nina
Massive open online courses (MOOCs) often are viewed as synonymous with innovation and openness. In this chapter, we trace their origins and varied manifestations and the ways they are understood. We interrogate the ...
Match: Hood, Nina; Littlejohn, Allison
Massive open online courses: A traditional or transformative approach to learning
Vale, Katie; Littlejohn, Allison; Littlejohn, Allison; Pegler, Chris
This chapter examines potential benefits and limitations of MOOCs, using a case example of a major MOOC initiative:edX. This chapter begins by examining conflicting perspectives around MOOCs from the literature. Then ...
Match: Littlejohn, Allison
Quality in MOOCs: Surveying the terrain
Hood, Nina; Littlejohn, Allison
The purpose of this review is to identify quality measures and to highlight some of the tensions surrounding notions of quality, as well as the need for new ways of thinking about and approaching quality in MOOCs. It ...
Match: Hood, Nina; Littlejohn, Allison
Learning challenges in higher education: An analysis of contradictions within Open Educational Practice
Kaatrakoski, Heli; Littlejohn, Allison; Hood, Nina
Open education, including the use of open educational resources (OER) and the adoption of open education practice, has the potential to challenge educators to change their practice in fundamental ways. This paper forms ...
Match: Hood, Nina; Littlejohn, Allison
Open, lifewide learning: A vision
Littlejohn, Allison; Falconer, Isobel; McGill, Lou; Littlejohn, Allison; Pegler, Chris
Match: Littlejohn, Allison
