Collating global evidence of the design, use, reuse and redesign of open educational content
Published | 2010 |
Conference | Open Educational Resources 2010 (OER10) |
ABSTRACT
Open Educational Resources (OER) are available globally in many OER repositories. Since The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) (http://web.mit.edu/) OpenCourseWare (OCW) initiative began, seven years have elapsed. Therefore it is time to consider and evaluate what has worked, why and how we can maximise on the design and redesign of OER for the benefit of learners and teachers. Open Learning Network (OLnet) is an outward facing and open research project, which started in March 2009. Based on lessons from experience and evidence worldwide, the initial aim of the project is to draw in existing OER and social networked communities to evaluate what types of OER have worked well in terms of learning and teaching. The project investigates the best ways to develop new OER and redesign existing OER for reuse. OLnet is funded by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation and starts from a base of having a number of partners, to build upon over the three-year period of the project. Methods for developing Open Educational Resources (OER) have evolved from different initiatives and projects. The first part of this paper is a step towards exploring the challenges faced and opportunities gained from different approaches. The methods adopted by two OER projects OpenER and OpenLearn are considered. Although OER may be created with one audience in mind (Higher Education) they can be adopted and adapted by different age groups and those with a variety of prior learning experiences. The second part of the paper considers the potential and actual adoption of OER by the school and further education sector. Questions addressed regarding the potential of OER are as follows: - Could OER material fit into the present timetable of study? - Might institutions provide assessment for OER material? - How would material be assessed? - What policies and procedures would need to be used or changed to allow the adoption of OER material for assessment? - Might OER material be better suited to learning in cases of non-accreditation? Finally the paper discusses two examples of reuse: one of material from DigilessenVO and the other a contrasting example from OpenLearn.Language | en |
URL | http://oro.open.ac.uk/21122/ |
Export options | BibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar |
Viewed by 110 distinct readers
CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS
The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.
Click a star to be the first to rate this document
▶ POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS
Evaluating three different Open Educational Resource models provided to enable Learning in Our Connected World
Kursun, Engin; Wilson, Tina; McAndrew, Patrick; Cagiltay, Kursat
The swift advancement of Web technologies has provided real opportunities for improving access, transfer and sharing of knowledge and information. One of the outcomes facilitated by these technologies is the Open ...
Match: Wilson, Tina; McAndrew, Patrick
Production of OER, a quest for efficiency
Schuwer, Robert; Wilson, Tina; van Valkenburg, Willem; Lane, Andy
In most initiatives to publish Open Educational Resources (OER), the production of OER is the activity with the highest costs. Based on literature and personal experiences a list of relevant characteristics of ...
Match: Wilson, Tina; Schuwer, Robert
OpenLearn research report 2006-2008
McAndrew, Patrick; Santos, A.; Lane, Andy; Godwin, Stephen; et al.
This report takes the experience of OpenLearn over its two-years of operation to reflect on what it means to offer free resources and the issues that we have been able to explore and learn from. The structure of the ...
Match: Wilson, Tina; McAndrew, Patrick
Beyond the pioneering phase: Moving towards the adoption of open education
Schuwer, Robert; Wild, Ulrike; Baas, Marjon; van Hees, Janina; et al.
MIT launched the global Open Educational Resources (OER) movement in 2001. The movement gained a major impetus in 2012 following the emergence of MOOCs: free online courses, often offered by leading research ...
Match: Schuwer, Robert
Are open educational resources the future of e-learning?
Kozinska, K.; Kursun, Engin; Wilson, Tina; McAndrew, Patrick; et al.
Increased interest in more open approaches to learning, in particular Open Educational Resources is reflected in the programmes of international organisations, national initiatives and the actions of individual ...
Match: Wilson, Tina; McAndrew, Patrick
Connecting various forms of openness: Seeking a stronger value proposition
van der Woert, Nicolai; Schuwer, Robert; Ouwehand, Martijn; Baas, Marjon; et al.
In addition to open education, open access, open source software and open innovation, the open movement has also developed other varieties of ‘openness’. Although many types of ‘openness’ exist, they are all ...
Match: Schuwer, Robert
Research agenda
Schuwer, Robert; Baas, Marjon; van Hees, Janina; Jacobi, Ria; et al.
To gain an overview of subjects that are currently on the research agenda, an analysis has been conducted on papers, presentations and abstracts presented at a variety of major conferences on open and online education. ...
Match: Schuwer, Robert
Reusing, reworking and remixing open educational resources
Lane, Andy; Connolly, Teresa; Ferreira, Giselle; McAndrew, Patrick; et al.
Open educational resources are largely a phenomenon of the Web, although they can be used as offline resources. We have provided a rough guide to the OER world, and OpenLearn in particular in the case study, ...
Match: Wilson, Tina; McAndrew, Patrick
Using new tools to support creative community engagement with open educational resources
Wilson, Tina; McAndrew, Patrick
The availability of community building tools and open educational resources (OER) affords the creation of new and innovative learning spaces. However in much of the work on OER the focus has been on providing content, ...
Match: Wilson, Tina; McAndrew, Patrick
The 2015 open and online education trend report: Perspectives on developments in Dutch higher education
Baas, Marjon; Buitendijk, Simone; van Elk, Lianne; Filius, Renée; et al.
For the fourth consecutive year, the Open Education Special Interest Group and SURFnet have prepared a trend report outlining the latest dynamic developments in the area of open content, open education and – as of ...
Match: Schuwer, Robert