Moodle 2 for OER: the good, the bad and the ugly
| Published | April 2012 |
| Conference | Cambridge 2012, April 16-18: Innovation and Impact - Openly Collaborating to Enhance Education Pages 1-3 |
| Country | United Kingdom, Europe |
ABSTRACT
Moodle 1.9 is no longer being actively developed. By July 2012 it will reach end-of-life meaning that even serious security issues will no longer be addressed. All sites, whether for paying students or Open Educational Resources, hosted on Moodle 1.9 (and earlier) should be working on a migration plan.This poster session will look at the way the Open University of the United Kingdom tackled the problem for their student-facing systems and LearningSpace OCW site, both of which were based on the same heavily-customised Moodle 1.9 platform.
We will briefly cover how we assessed alternative platforms, looking at how well they implement our required functionality and the cost of migration. We continue to wish to use open technologies, and to manage LearningSpace in a sustainable way based on mainstream activities.
We will share our thoughts on what’s good, bad and downright ugly about Moodle 2 for OER, looking at everything from support for licence choice and other IP issues, publishing RSS feeds, support for peer-to-peer learning, search engine optimisation, ease of re-use, support for ratings and reviews, activity tracking, self-assessment, flexibility of structuring materials, mobile learning, support for content authoring and management...
We hope the audience will share their experiences as well. We wish to continue to collaborate with other educational institutions and the Moodle community to improve Moodle 2 so that it better meets the needs of OER. Our aim is that as a result of this presentation we will have a better picture of the problems facing not just the OUUK but the wider OER Moodle community. We hope to gather offers of help in any of the following areas: setting requirements, developing code, testing, translating or documenting new features. These can be taken to the core Moodle development team help us make better progress together.
| Keywords | OER Moodle · platform · technology |
| Published at | Cambridge |
| Refereed | Yes |
| Rights | by/3.0 |
| URL | http://www.ucel.ac.uk/oer12/abstracts/228.html |
| Export options | BibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar |
AVAILABLE FILES
Viewed by 437 distinct readers
CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS
The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.
Click a star to be the first to rate this document
▶ POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS
MOOC pedagogy: Gleaning good practice from existing MOOCs
Bali, Maha
The revolutionary potential of massive open online courses (MOOCs) has been met with much skepticism, particularly in terms of the quality of learning offered. Believing that a focus on learning is more important than a ...
Match: good
The sustained reach and impact of open educational resources
Rolfe, Vivien
From 2009 to 2012, De Montfort University participated in the UK Open Educational Resource (OER) programme releasing bioscience materials, with the Virtual Analytical Laboratory (VAL), the SCOOTER Project and generic ...
Match: United Kingdom
Good intentions: improving the evidence base in support of sharing learning materials
McGill, Lou; Currier, Sarah; Duncan, Charles; Douglas, Peter
Match: good
Design model for integrating Learning Activity Management System (LAMS), Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) and flipped classroom in Taylor's Integrated Moodle e-Learning System (TIMeS)
Wong, Seng Yue; Tee, Wee Jing; Lim, Pui Voon; Tang, Siew Fun; Logonnathan, Loshinikarasi
The e-learning strategic plan for Taylor's University is being much student centred and focuses on intentional learning. Blended learning has been proposed to apply in Taylor's University to enrich students' quality via ...
Match: moodle
OERs: the good, the bad and the ugly
Bates, Tony
I increasingly fear that the open educational resources movement is being used as a way of perpetuating inequalities in education while purporting to be democratic. Some components of OERs also smack of hypocrisy, ...
Match: good
As good or better than commercial textbooks: Students’ perceptions and outcomes from using open digital and open print textbooks
Jhangiani, Rajiv S.; Dastur, Farhad N.; Le Grand, Richard; Penner, Kurt
The increase in the cost of college textbooks together with the proliferation of digital content and devices has inspired the development of open textbooks, open educational resources that are free, openly licensed, and ...
Match: good
Open courses education model and application based on Moodle
Wu, Hai Yan; Wunsch, D C.; Tan, HH; Zeng, D H.; Luo, Q.
A network open learning services support platform based on the open source moodle is constructed in this paper. First, an open teaching model based on open education resources is described, the model is based on ...
Match: moodle
Free! Open Educational Resources Are Good Business for Summer Sessions
Chismar, William G.
Students at institutions of higher education are spending millions of dollars per semester on textbooks. This financial burden is having a negative impact on student success. By promoting the use of free course ...
Match: good
Building graduate-level, gamified xMOOCs in Moodle
Birkenkrahe, Marcus
We present preliminary results from two different online course design experiments: in the first experiment, which ran from April to June 2015, the author developed an online precourse on Research Methods for Master ...
Match: moodle; Europe
Choosing the right platform for OER projects
Hwang, Meena
There are many technical decisions to be made in starting an open educational resources (OER) project, and a decision on what platform to use is one of the most preliminary and important considerations. OER projects ...
Match: platform









