APEC university associations cross-border education cooperation workshop discussion paper
| Alternate title | Promoting regional education services integration: APEC university associations cross-border education cooperation workshop |
| Published | May 2014 |
| Type of work | Discussion Paper |
| Periodical | Pages 1-57 |
| Publisher | Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Secretariat |
| Region | Oceania |
ABSTRACT
This discussion paper was prepared to inform the APEC workshop on Promoting Regional Education Services Integration: APEC University Associations Cross-Border Education Cooperation held in Kuala Lumpur from 20–22 May 2014. The workshop brings together university associations to support, pursue and work towards the achievement of the priorities outlined by APEC Economic Leaders. This includes the recognition of best practice in cross-border education (CBE), the identification of existing barriers to CBE, and an examination of ways to progress the priority areas identified. The paper highlights the key considerations for APEC economies in strengthening collaboration around CBE in the university sector and builds on previous work undertaken within APEC and around the world. It focuses attention on four key areas of CBE: Student mobility; researcher mobility; provider mobility and mobility without movement. In each area there are a number of practical strategies to enhance CBE which can be considered during the workshop.| Keywords | Student Mobility · CBE · cross-border education · MOOC · OER accreditation · researcher mobility |
| Refereed | Does not apply |
| Rights | by/3.0/au |
| URL | http://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1040&context=higher_education |
| Export options | BibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar |
AVAILABLE FILES
Viewed by 249 distinct readers
CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS
The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.
Click a star to be the first to rate this document
▶ POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS
Comparative between quality assessment tools for MOOCs: ADECUR vs Standard UNE 66181: 2012
Ramirez Fernandez, Miguel Baldomero; Salmeron Silvera, Jose Luis; López Meneses, Eloy
Massive open online courses (MOOCs) have emerged in informative and scientific literature as a revolution with great potential within the educational and training world. However, at the same time, there are ...
Match: mooc
Systematic mapping study of academic engagement in MOOC
Guajardo Leal, Brenda Edith; Navarro-Corona, Claudia
MOOCs are presented as an affordable and easily accessible modality that offers the opportunity to democratize education in our time; however, this convenience training favors a low completion rate of the participants. ...
Match: mooc
What have they done with the MOOCs?! The impact of MOOCs on Campus Education
Cabral, Pedro; van Valkenburg, Willem; Dopper, Sofia; Ubachs, George; Konings, Lizzie
Overview of papers on enhancement of European Higher Education as presented during the Online, Open and Flexible Higher Education Conference in Rome, October 2016
In 2013 Delft University of Technology (TU Delft) ...
Match: mooc
The "Promises" of online higher education: Profits
Campaign for the Future of Higher Education
With so much national focus on the “promises” of online higher education to expand access and to reduce costs, one truth about online higher education rarely mentioned is that it is big—Very Big—business. ...
Match: mooc
Remarks on MOOCS and Mini-MOOCS
Spector, Michael J.
In an earlier issue of ETR{&}D, the editors provided an hierarchical framework of components to support learning and instruction. That hierarchy included information objects, knowledge objects, learning objects, ...
Match: mooc
Examining the relations among student motivation, engagement, and retention in a MOOC: A structural equation modeling approach
Xiong, Yao; Li, Hongli; Kornhaber, Mindy L.; Suen, Hoi K.; et al.
Students who are enrolled in MOOCs tend to have different motivational patterns than fee-paying college students. A majority of MOOC students demonstrate characteristics akin more to "tourists" than formal learners. As ...
Match: mooc
All Digital Academy Project: Upskilling Adult Educators on Key Digital Emerging Technologies
Manfredini, Alessia; Casella, Monica; Esposito, Raffaella; Marocco, Davide
Recent advances in technology present vast opportunities, yet the European Commission reports that only 56% of people aged 16–74 possess basic digital skills. To bridge this gap, the All Digital Academy (ADA) project ...
Match: mooc
MOOCs and Open Educational Resources: A handbook for educators
Kaufman, Peter B.
MOOCs and Open Educational Resources: A Handbook for Educators is being made available for university faculty, educators, and educational producers involved in producing online courses. The guide is a step-by-step ...
Match: mooc
Towards a conceptual framework to scaffold self-regulation in a MOOC
Sambe, Gorgoumack; Bouchet, François; Labat, Jean-Marc; M. F. Kebe, Cheikh; et al.
MOOCs are part of the ecosystem of self-learning for which self-regulation is one of the pillars. Weakness of self-regulation skills is one of the key factors that contribute to dropout in a MOOC. We present a ...
Match: mooc
Failure of access: Rethinking open education
Abeywardena, Ishan S
Presented by Dr. Ishan Abeywardena, Adviser - Open Educational Resources, Commonwealth of Learning, at the keynote presentation for Open Education Week at Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada on 28 March ...
Match: mooc
