APEC university associations cross-border education cooperation workshop discussion paper
| Alternate title | Promoting regional education services integration: APEC university associations cross-border education cooperation workshop |
| Published | May 2014 |
| Type of work | Discussion Paper |
| Periodical | Pages 1-57 |
| Publisher | Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Secretariat |
| Region | Oceania |
ABSTRACT
This discussion paper was prepared to inform the APEC workshop on Promoting Regional Education Services Integration: APEC University Associations Cross-Border Education Cooperation held in Kuala Lumpur from 20–22 May 2014. The workshop brings together university associations to support, pursue and work towards the achievement of the priorities outlined by APEC Economic Leaders. This includes the recognition of best practice in cross-border education (CBE), the identification of existing barriers to CBE, and an examination of ways to progress the priority areas identified. The paper highlights the key considerations for APEC economies in strengthening collaboration around CBE in the university sector and builds on previous work undertaken within APEC and around the world. It focuses attention on four key areas of CBE: Student mobility; researcher mobility; provider mobility and mobility without movement. In each area there are a number of practical strategies to enhance CBE which can be considered during the workshop.| Keywords | Student Mobility · CBE · cross-border education · MOOC · OER accreditation · researcher mobility |
| Refereed | Does not apply |
| Rights | by/3.0/au |
| URL | http://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1040&context=higher_education |
| Export options | BibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar |
AVAILABLE FILES
Viewed by 532 distinct readers
CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS
The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.
Click a star to be the first to rate this document
▶ POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS
From OER to PLAR: Credentialing for Open Education
Friesen, Norm; Wihak, Christine
Recent developments in OER and MOOCs (Open Educational Resources and Massive Open Online Courses) have raised questions as to how learners engaging with these courses and components might be assessed or credentialed. ...
Match: MOOC
Editorial: Massive Open Online Courses, a perspective paper by Sir John Daniel
McAndrew, Patrick; Jones, Ann
This issue focusses on a perspective article by Sir John Daniel. Sir John has a long history of involvement with the Open University, the UK home of JIME. Indeed as he points out in his biography (Daniel, 2012), he ...
Match: MOOC
Exploring the ethical implications of MOOCs
Marshall, Stephen
Massive open online courses (MOOCs) represent a potentially exciting opportunity to use technology to realise many of the long-promised benefits of universal higher education. While there are many positive aspects to ...
Match: MOOC
Mentoring learners in MOOCs: A new way to improve completion rates?
Dhorne, Lucie; Deflandre, Jean-Pierre; Bernaert, Olivier; Bianchi, Sébastien; et al.
Since the launch of the MIT Open-Course Ware in 2001, MOOCs have developed exponentially. From a dozen in 2011, they have become ubiquitous in higher education nowadays. Far from bringing about a revolution in teaching ...
Match: MOOC
A tale of two modes: Initial reflections on an innovative MOOC
Sinclair, Jane; Boyatt, Russell; Foss, Jonathan; Rocks, Claire; et al.
Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are offered by many universities, with hundreds thousands of people worldwide having registered for one or more of the many available courses. Despite the potential that has been ...
Match: MOOC
Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses
Kizilcec, René F.; Piech, Chris; Schneider, Emily
As MOOCs grow in popularity, the relatively low completion rates of learners has been a central criticism. This focus on completion rates, however, reflects a monolithic view of disengagement that does not allow MOOC ...
Match: MOOC
Comparing institutional MOOC strategies 2015- Czech Republic report: Status report based on a mapping survey conducted in October – December 2015
Rohlíková, Lucie; Rohlík, Ondřej; Jansen, Darco; Goes-Daniels, Miriam; et al.
Executive Summary
Institutional MOOC involvement
Czech HEIs are mostly still in the process of finding their way to their own MOOC courses. The Czech Association of Distance Teaching Universities (ČADUV) at the ...
Match: MOOC
Scenarios for the use of OpenCourseWare in the context of student mobility
Verbeken, Stephanie; Truyen, Frederik
In the context of a European OpenCourseWare project, funded by the EU Lifelong Learning Program, a handbook has been created with the purpose of showing how students and universities throughout Europe can get the most ...
Match: Student Mobility
HarvardX and MITx: The first year of open online courses: Fall 2012-summer 2013
Ho, Andrew Dean; Reich, Justin; Nesterko, Sergiy O.; Seaton, Daniel Thomas; et al.
HarvardX and MITx are collaborative institutional efforts between Harvard University and MIT to enhance campus-based education, advance educational research, and increase access to online learning opportunities ...
Match: MOOC
Interactions in MOOCs: The hidden part of the iceberg
Cisel, Matthieu
Interactions that take place between MOOC users outside of discussion forums, and out of the reach of course designers, have received little attention from the scientific community despite their potential influence on ...
Match: MOOC
