The OER Knowledge Cloud makes use of cookies. By continuing, you consent to this use. More information.
APEC university associations cross-border education cooperation workshop discussion paper
Richardson, Sarah [editor] and Radloff, Ali [editor]

Alternate titlePromoting regional education services integration: APEC university associations cross-border education cooperation workshop
PublishedMay 2014
Type of workDiscussion Paper
PeriodicalPages 1-57
PublisherAsia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Secretariat
RegionOceania

ABSTRACT
This discussion paper was prepared to inform the APEC workshop on Promoting Regional Education Services Integration: APEC University Associations Cross-Border Education Cooperation held in Kuala Lumpur from 20–22 May 2014. The workshop brings together university associations to support, pursue and work towards the achievement of the priorities outlined by APEC Economic Leaders. This includes the recognition of best practice in cross-border education (CBE), the identification of existing barriers to CBE, and an examination of ways to progress the priority areas identified. The paper highlights the key considerations for APEC economies in strengthening collaboration around CBE in the university sector and builds on previous work undertaken within APEC and around the world. It focuses attention on four key areas of CBE: Student mobility; researcher mobility; provider mobility and mobility without movement. In each area there are a number of practical strategies to enhance CBE which can be considered during the workshop.

Keywords Student Mobility · CBE · cross-border education · MOOC · OER accreditation · researcher mobility

RefereedDoes not apply
Rightsby/3.0/au
URLhttp://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1040&context=higher_education
Export optionsBibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar



AVAILABLE FILES
APEC_CBE_Workshop_Paper.pdf · 1.4MB173 downloads



Viewed by 370 distinct readers




CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS

The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.

Click a star to be the first to rate this document


POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS

Mentoring learners in MOOCs: A new way to improve completion rates?
Dhorne, Lucie; Deflandre, Jean-Pierre; Bernaert, Olivier; Bianchi, Sébastien; et al.
Since the launch of the MIT Open-Course Ware in 2001, MOOCs have developed exponentially. From a dozen in 2011, they have become ubiquitous in higher education nowadays. Far from bringing about a revolution in teaching ...
Match: MOOC

Challenges of identifying second language English speakers in MOOCs
Duru, Ismail; Sunar, Ayse Saliha; Dogan, Gulustan; White, Su; et al.
In this study, we aim to analyse English as a Second Language (ESL) and English as a First Language (EFL) MOOC participants' engagements in a MOOC. We aim to find out key points which directly effect learners' dropout ...
Match: MOOC

The time factor in MOOCS: Time-on-task, interaction temporal patterns, and time perspectives in a MOOC
Romero, M.; Usart, M.
MOOCs are a current trend in Higher Education; universities around the world offer open courses for lifelong and geographically distributed learners. Nevertheless, there is a high drop-out rate on these courses. The ...
Match: MOOC

MOOC as a complex system
Nakano, Natália; Padua, Mariana Cantisani; Jorente, Maria José Vicentini; Bourgine, Paul; et al.
Considering the current scenario of technological innovations, re-shaped connections and relationships, discussions on new formats of knowledge construction and dissemination that meet the needs of human beings are ...
Match: MOOC

Understanding learning and teaching in MOOCs from the perspectives of students and instructors: A review of literature from 2014 to 2016
Deng, Ruiqi; Benckendorff, Pierre; Gannaway, Deanne; Kloos, Carlos Delgado; et al.
This article presents the results of a literature review on key learning and teaching dimensions in MOOCs. 95 studies published from January 2014 to October 2016 were selected for review. Four important learning and ...
Match: MOOC

All Digital Academy Project: Upskilling Adult Educators on Key Digital Emerging Technologies
Manfredini, Alessia; Casella, Monica; Esposito, Raffaella; Marocco, Davide
Recent advances in technology present vast opportunities, yet the European Commission reports that only 56% of people aged 16–74 possess basic digital skills. To bridge this gap, the All Digital Academy (ADA) project ...
Match: MOOC

Reflections on Stanford's MOOCs
Cooper, Steve; Sahami, Mehran
The recent wave of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) has highlighted the potential for making educational offerings accessible at a global level. The attention MOOCs have received is well deserved, but it belies the ...
Match: MOOC

Will MOOCs kill university degrees?
The Economist
Match: MOOC

Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses
Kizilcec, René F.; Piech, Chris; Schneider, Emily
As MOOCs grow in popularity, the relatively low completion rates of learners has been a central criticism. This focus on completion rates, however, reflects a monolithic view of disengagement that does not allow MOOC ...
Match: MOOC

Impacts of MOOCs on online learning and campus-based course design
Phan, Trang; Tomei, Lawrence; Milheim, Karen L.
There are two lines of expert debates on whether MOOCs could improve the overall quality of college and university education in America. Experts like Fiona Hollands believe MOOCs have made positive influence in ...
Match: MOOC