The OER Knowledge Cloud makes use of cookies. By continuing, you consent to this use. More information.
APEC university associations cross-border education cooperation workshop discussion paper
Richardson, Sarah [editor] and Radloff, Ali [editor]

Alternate titlePromoting regional education services integration: APEC university associations cross-border education cooperation workshop
PublishedMay 2014
Type of workDiscussion Paper
PeriodicalPages 1-57
PublisherAsia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Secretariat
RegionOceania

ABSTRACT
This discussion paper was prepared to inform the APEC workshop on Promoting Regional Education Services Integration: APEC University Associations Cross-Border Education Cooperation held in Kuala Lumpur from 20–22 May 2014. The workshop brings together university associations to support, pursue and work towards the achievement of the priorities outlined by APEC Economic Leaders. This includes the recognition of best practice in cross-border education (CBE), the identification of existing barriers to CBE, and an examination of ways to progress the priority areas identified. The paper highlights the key considerations for APEC economies in strengthening collaboration around CBE in the university sector and builds on previous work undertaken within APEC and around the world. It focuses attention on four key areas of CBE: Student mobility; researcher mobility; provider mobility and mobility without movement. In each area there are a number of practical strategies to enhance CBE which can be considered during the workshop.

Keywords Student Mobility · CBE · cross-border education · MOOC · OER accreditation · researcher mobility

RefereedDoes not apply
Rightsby/3.0/au
URLhttp://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1040&context=higher_education
Export optionsBibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar



AVAILABLE FILES
APEC_CBE_Workshop_Paper.pdf · 1.4MB122 downloads



Viewed by 249 distinct readers




CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS

The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.

Click a star to be the first to rate this document


POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS

Comparative between quality assessment tools for MOOCs: ADECUR vs Standard UNE 66181: 2012
Ramirez Fernandez, Miguel Baldomero; Salmeron Silvera, Jose Luis; López Meneses, Eloy
Massive open online courses (MOOCs) have emerged in informative and scientific literature as a revolution with great potential within the educational and training world. However, at the same time, there are ...
Match: mooc

Systematic mapping study of academic engagement in MOOC
Guajardo Leal, Brenda Edith; Navarro-Corona, Claudia
MOOCs are presented as an affordable and easily accessible modality that offers the opportunity to democratize education in our time; however, this convenience training favors a low completion rate of the participants. ...
Match: mooc

What have they done with the MOOCs?! The impact of MOOCs on Campus Education
Cabral, Pedro; van Valkenburg, Willem; Dopper, Sofia; Ubachs, George; Konings, Lizzie
Overview of papers on enhancement of European Higher Education as presented during the Online, Open and Flexible Higher Education Conference in Rome, October 2016 In 2013 Delft University of Technology (TU Delft) ...
Match: mooc

The "Promises" of online higher education: Profits
Campaign for the Future of Higher Education
With so much national focus on the “promises” of online higher education to expand access and to reduce costs, one truth about online higher education rarely mentioned is that it is big—Very Big—business. ...
Match: mooc

Remarks on MOOCS and Mini-MOOCS
Spector, Michael J.
In an earlier issue of ETR{&}D, the editors provided an hierarchical framework of components to support learning and instruction. That hierarchy included information objects, knowledge objects, learning objects, ...
Match: mooc

Examining the relations among student motivation, engagement, and retention in a MOOC: A structural equation modeling approach
Xiong, Yao; Li, Hongli; Kornhaber, Mindy L.; Suen, Hoi K.; et al.
Students who are enrolled in MOOCs tend to have different motivational patterns than fee-paying college students. A majority of MOOC students demonstrate characteristics akin more to "tourists" than formal learners. As ...
Match: mooc

All Digital Academy Project: Upskilling Adult Educators on Key Digital Emerging Technologies
Manfredini, Alessia; Casella, Monica; Esposito, Raffaella; Marocco, Davide
Recent advances in technology present vast opportunities, yet the European Commission reports that only 56% of people aged 16–74 possess basic digital skills. To bridge this gap, the All Digital Academy (ADA) project ...
Match: mooc

MOOCs and Open Educational Resources: A handbook for educators
Kaufman, Peter B.
MOOCs and Open Educational Resources: A Handbook for Educators is being made available for university faculty, educators, and educational producers involved in producing online courses. The guide is a step-by-step ...
Match: mooc

Towards a conceptual framework to scaffold self-regulation in a MOOC
Sambe, Gorgoumack; Bouchet, François; Labat, Jean-Marc; M. F. Kebe, Cheikh; et al.
MOOCs are part of the ecosystem of self-learning for which self-regulation is one of the pillars. Weakness of self-regulation skills is one of the key factors that contribute to dropout in a MOOC. We present a ...
Match: mooc

Failure of access: Rethinking open education
Abeywardena, Ishan S
Presented by Dr. Ishan Abeywardena, Adviser - Open Educational Resources, Commonwealth of Learning, at the keynote presentation for Open Education Week at Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada on 28 March ...
Match: mooc