The OER Knowledge Cloud makes use of cookies. By continuing, you consent to this use. More information.
APEC university associations cross-border education cooperation workshop discussion paper
Richardson, Sarah [editor] and Radloff, Ali [editor]

Alternate titlePromoting regional education services integration: APEC university associations cross-border education cooperation workshop
PublishedMay 2014
Type of workDiscussion Paper
PeriodicalPages 1-57
PublisherAsia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Secretariat
RegionOceania

ABSTRACT
This discussion paper was prepared to inform the APEC workshop on Promoting Regional Education Services Integration: APEC University Associations Cross-Border Education Cooperation held in Kuala Lumpur from 20–22 May 2014. The workshop brings together university associations to support, pursue and work towards the achievement of the priorities outlined by APEC Economic Leaders. This includes the recognition of best practice in cross-border education (CBE), the identification of existing barriers to CBE, and an examination of ways to progress the priority areas identified. The paper highlights the key considerations for APEC economies in strengthening collaboration around CBE in the university sector and builds on previous work undertaken within APEC and around the world. It focuses attention on four key areas of CBE: Student mobility; researcher mobility; provider mobility and mobility without movement. In each area there are a number of practical strategies to enhance CBE which can be considered during the workshop.

Keywords Student Mobility · CBE · cross-border education · MOOC · OER accreditation · researcher mobility

RefereedDoes not apply
Rightsby/3.0/au
URLhttp://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1040&context=higher_education
Export optionsBibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar



AVAILABLE FILES
APEC_CBE_Workshop_Paper.pdf · 1.4MB180 downloads



Viewed by 380 distinct readers




CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS

The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.

Click a star to be the first to rate this document


POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS

In the year of disruptive education
Hyman, Paul
As college tuitions soar, various online models vie to educate college students worldwide---at no cost.
Match: MOOC

Multimodal profusion in the literacies of the Massive Open Online Course
Knox, Jeremy; Bayne, Siân
This paper takes a view of digital literacy, which moves beyond a focus on technical methods and skills in an attempt to maintain a broader approach that encompasses a critical view of the learning subject. In doing ...
Match: MOOC

Grade change: Tracking online education in the United States
Allen, Elaine I.; Seaman, Jeff
Grade Change: Tracking Online Education in the United States is the eleventh annual report on the state of online learning among higher education institutions in the United States. The study is aimed at answering some ...
Match: MOOC

Quad-blogging: Promoting peer-to-peer learning in a MOOC
Towndrow, Angela; Aranguiz, Ary; Purser, Emily; Pradhan, Madhura; et al.
We present the concept of quad-blogging, and its potential for facilitating and enhancing peer-to-peer learning in higher education, specifically in a massive open online course (MOOC) by increasing peer engagement, ...
Match: MOOC

MOOCs as disruptive technologies: Strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs
This chapter considers the pedagogies associated with different types of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). It argues that the current discourse around the concept of xMOOCs (primarily based around interaction with ...
Match: MOOC

Comparative between quality assessment tools for MOOCs: ADECUR vs Standard UNE 66181: 2012
Ramirez Fernandez, Miguel Baldomero; Salmeron Silvera, Jose Luis; López Meneses, Eloy
Massive open online courses (MOOCs) have emerged in informative and scientific literature as a revolution with great potential within the educational and training world. However, at the same time, there are ...
Match: MOOC

Who are the open learners? A comparative study profiling non-formal users of open educational resources
Farrow, Rob; de los Arcos, Beatriz; Pitt, R.; Weller, M.
Open educational resources (OER) have been identified as having the potential to extend opportunities for learning to non-formal learners. However, little research has been conducted into the impact of OER on non-formal ...
Match: MOOC

Mentoring learners in MOOCs: A new way to improve completion rates?
Dhorne, Lucie; Deflandre, Jean-Pierre; Bernaert, Olivier; Bianchi, Sébastien; et al.
Since the launch of the MIT Open-Course Ware in 2001, MOOCs have developed exponentially. From a dozen in 2011, they have become ubiquitous in higher education nowadays. Far from bringing about a revolution in teaching ...
Match: MOOC

Open & online: Wales, higher education and emerging modes of learning: Report of the Online Digital Learning Working Group
Online Digital Learning Working Group
In February 2013, Leighton Andrews AM, then Minister for Education and Skills established the Online Digital Learning Working Group. The Group drew on expertise from further and higher education in Wales. Its remit ...
Match: MOOC

Mind to MOOC
Kanwar, Asha
MESSAGE Open University of China & ICDE Seminar, Beijing, China, 21 October 2013 by Professor Asha Kanwar, Commonwealth of Learning // The Commonwealth of Learning is an intergovernmental organization which promotes ...
Match: MOOC