APEC university associations cross-border education cooperation workshop discussion paper
Richardson, Sarah [editor] and Radloff, Ali [editor]

Alternate titlePromoting regional education services integration: APEC university associations cross-border education cooperation workshop
PublishedMay 2014
Type of workDiscussion Paper
PeriodicalPages 1-57
PublisherAsia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Secretariat
RegionOceania

ABSTRACT
This discussion paper was prepared to inform the APEC workshop on Promoting Regional Education Services Integration: APEC University Associations Cross-Border Education Cooperation held in Kuala Lumpur from 20–22 May 2014. The workshop brings together university associations to support, pursue and work towards the achievement of the priorities outlined by APEC Economic Leaders. This includes the recognition of best practice in cross-border education (CBE), the identification of existing barriers to CBE, and an examination of ways to progress the priority areas identified. The paper highlights the key considerations for APEC economies in strengthening collaboration around CBE in the university sector and builds on previous work undertaken within APEC and around the world. It focuses attention on four key areas of CBE: Student mobility; researcher mobility; provider mobility and mobility without movement. In each area there are a number of practical strategies to enhance CBE which can be considered during the workshop.

Keywords Student Mobility · CBE · cross-border education · MOOC · OER accreditation · researcher mobility

RefereedDoes not apply
Rightsby/3.0/au
URLhttp://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1040&context=higher_education
Export optionsBibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar



AVAILABLE FILES
APEC_CBE_Workshop_Paper.pdf · 1.4MB169 downloads



Viewed by 348 distinct readers




CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS

The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.

Click a star to be the first to rate this document


POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS

Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States
Allen, Elaine I.; Seaman, Jeff
Changing Course: Ten Years of Tracking Online Education in the United States is the tenth annual report on the state of online learning among higher education institutions in the United States. The study is aimed at ...
Match: MOOC

Learning potentials and educational challenges of massive open online courses (MOOCs) in lifelong learning
Buhl, Mie; Andreasen, Lars Birch
Match: MOOC

Do MOOCs contribute to student equity and social inclusion? A systematic review 2014–18
Lambert, Sarah
In recent years, hopes that Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) would make access to education fairer faded in the light of research showing MOOCs favoured the already educated and relatively advantaged. This paper ...
Match: MOOC

MOOCs for Norway: New digital learning methods in higher education
Kjeldstad, Berit; Alvestrand, Harald; Elvestad, Endre Olsvik; Ingebretsen, Trond; et al.
The report is divided into the following chapters: Chap. 1: Introduction Chap. 2: The Commission’s definition of MOOCs Chap. 3: The Commission’s recommendations Chap. 4: MOOCs in a social perspective Chap. 5: ...
Match: MOOC

Grade change: Tracking online education in the United States
Allen, Elaine I.; Seaman, Jeff
Grade Change: Tracking Online Education in the United States is the eleventh annual report on the state of online learning among higher education institutions in the United States. The study is aimed at answering some ...
Match: MOOC

From low-scale to collaborative, gamified and massive-scale courses: Redesigning a MOOC
Ortega-Arranz, Alejandro; Sanz-Martínez, Luisa; Álvarez-Álvarez, Susana; Muñoz-Cristóbal, Juan A.; et al.
Despite the success of MOOCs to promote open leaning, they are usually criticized for their high drop-out rates and behaviorist pedagogical approach. Some active learning strategies, such as collaboration and ...
Match: MOOC

Comparative between quality assessment tools for MOOCs: ADECUR vs Standard UNE 66181: 2012
Ramirez Fernandez, Miguel Baldomero; Salmeron Silvera, Jose Luis; López Meneses, Eloy
Massive open online courses (MOOCs) have emerged in informative and scientific literature as a revolution with great potential within the educational and training world. However, at the same time, there are ...
Match: MOOC

Open, online, and blended: Transactional interactions with MOOC content by learners in three different course formats
Emanuel, Jeffrey; Lamb, Anne
During the 2013-14 academic year, Harvard University piloted the use of MOOCs as tools for blended learning in select undergraduate and graduate residential and online courses. One of these courses, The Ancient Greek ...
Match: MOOC

La performativité du MOOC sur les représentations de l’apprenant : le cas du parcours MOOCLead
Cascioli, Fiammetta
Les MOOC constituent des outils d’apprentissage innovants (Christensen, 2013). Ils ont une portée amplificatrice (Christensen, 2013) et comptent parmiles technologies d’apprentissage à distance ayant recueilli de ...
Match: MOOC

Evaluation of Student Feedback Within a MOOC Using Sentiment Analysis and Target Groups
Lundqvist, Karsten Ø.; Liyanagunawardena, Tharindu; Starkey, Louise
Many course designers trying to evaluate the experience of participants in a MOOC will find it difficult to track and analyse the online actions and interactions of students because there may be thousands of learners ...
Match: MOOC; Oceania