The OER Knowledge Cloud makes use of cookies. By continuing, you consent to this use. More information.
MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012
Liyanagunawardena, Tharindu · Adams, Andrew · Williams, Shirley

PublishedJuly 2013
JournalThe International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 203-227
Original PublicationThe International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning
EditorsMcGreal, Rory and Conrad, Dianne

ABSTRACT
Massive open online courses (MOOCs) are a recent addition to the range of online learning options. Since 2008, MOOCs have been run by a variety of public and elite universities, especially in North America. Many academics have taken interest in MOOCs recognising the potential to deliver education around the globe on an unprecedented scale; some of these academics are taking a research-oriented perspective and academic papers describing their research are starting to appear in the traditional media of peer reviewed publications. This paper presents a systematic review of the published MOOC literature (2008-2012): Forty-five peer reviewed papers are identified through journals, database searches, searching the Web, and chaining from known sources to form the base for this review. We believe this is the first effort to systematically review literature relating to MOOCs, a fairly recent but massively popular phenomenon with a global reach. The review categorises the literature into eight different areas of interest, introductory, concept, case studies, educational theory, technology, participant focussed, provider focussed, and other, while also providing quantitative analysis of publications according to publication type, year of publication, and contributors. Future research directions guided by gaps in the literature are explored.

Keywords connectivism ·  · MOOC · systematic review

ISSN1492-3831
Other number3
RefereedYes
Rightsby/4.0
URLhttp://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1455
Other informationIRRODL
Export optionsBibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar



AVAILABLE FILES
1455-12355-2-PB.pdf · 398.8KB65 downloads



Viewed by 206 distinct readers




CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS

The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.

Click a star to be the first to rate this document


POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS

The impact and reach of MOOCs: A developing countries’ perspective
Liyanagunawardena, Tharindu Rekha; Williams, Shirley; Adams, Andrew; Koskinen, Tapio; Mor, Yishay
Massively Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are a recent but hugely popular phenomenon in the online learning world. They are hailed by many as a solution for the developing world’s lack of access to education because MOOCs ...
Match: adams, andrew; williams, shirley; connectivism; mooc

A systematic analysis and synthesis of the empirical MOOC literature published in 2013–2015
Veletsianos, George; Shepherdson, Peter; McGreal, Rory; Conrad, Dianne
A deluge of empirical research became available on MOOCs in 2013–2015 and this research is available in disparate sources. This paper addresses a number of gaps in the scholarly understanding of MOOCs and presents a ...
Match: literature; systematic; mooc

MOOCs, graduate skills gaps, and employability: A qualitative systematic review of the literature
Calonge, David; Shah, Mariam
The increasing costs of higher education (HE), growing numbers of flexible anytime, anywhere learners, and the prevalence of technology as a means to up-skill in a competitive job market, have brought to light a rising ...
Match: literature; systematic

Open educational practices: A literature review
Ross, Heather M.
A literature review on what is OER, what are the benefits, the barriers, the need for support and training, the stakeholders and their roles, and gaps in the literature at the time of writing.
Match: literature

Understanding learning and teaching in MOOCs from the perspectives of students and instructors: A review of literature from 2014 to 2016
Deng, Ruiqi; Benckendorff, Pierre; Gannaway, Deanne; Kloos, Carlos Delgado; et al.
This article presents the results of a literature review on key learning and teaching dimensions in MOOCs. 95 studies published from January 2014 to October 2016 were selected for review. Four important learning and ...
Match: literature; mooc

Open Educational Resources und Open Educational Practices – ein systematischer Literaturbericht im religionspädagogischen Horizont
Pirker, Viera; Pirner, Manfred L.
Open Educational Resources (OER) und Open Educational Practices (OEP) haben sich als zentrale Elemente der strategischen Entwicklung digitaler Bildungspraktiken etabliert, bleiben jedoch in der religionspädagogischen ...
Match: literature; systematic

MOOCs in China: A review of literature, 2012–2016
Li, Xiaoqin; Chen, Yanyue; Gong, Xiaojing; Ma, Will W.K.; et al.
MOOC has recently been a topic of research. Scholars from home and abroad dedicated their effort to examine the newly emerged matter from various perspectives. The purpose of this paper is to explore the present ...
Match: literature; mooc

Gains and Gaps in OER: Using Rubrics to Assess the Impact of OER on Writing and Information Literacy Skills in the Literature Classroom
Bankston, Sarah; LeMire, Sarah; Cooper, Rich Paul; Carly-Miles, Claire
Open educational resources (OER) reduce the textbook cost burden for students, but we must examine whether students using OER are learning the necessary skills to succeed in their academic work. This study used rubrics ...
Match: literature

Open educational resources repositories literature review – Towards a comprehensive quality approaches framework
Clements, Kati; Pawlowski, Jan; Manouselis, Nikos
Today, Open Educational Resources (OER) are commonly stored, used, adapted, remixed and shared within Learning object repositories (LORs) which have recently started expanding their design to support collaborative ...
Match: literature

An exploratory literature review on open educational practices
Koseoglu, Suzan; Bozkurt, Aras
This paper presents a review of peer-reviewed publications (2007–2017) on digital open educational practices (OEPs). It explores trends and patterns in this emerging area of study by examining paper abstracts and ...
Match: literature