Supporting professional learning in a massive open online course
Published | November 2014 |
Type of work | Special Issue: Research into Massive Open Online Courses |
Journal | The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages 197-213 |
Original Publication | The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning |
Editors | McGreal, Rory and Conrad, Dianne |
ABSTRACT
Professional learning, combining formal and on the job learning, is important for the development and maintenance of expertise in the modern workplace. To integrate formal and informal learning, professionals have to have good self-regulatory ability. Formal learning opportunities are opening up through massive open online courses (MOOCs), providing free and flexible access to formal education for millions of learners worldwide. MOOCs present a potentially useful mechanism for supporting and enabling professional learning, allowing opportunities to link formal and informal learning. However, there is limited understanding of their effectiveness as professional learning environments. Using self-regulated learning as a theoretical base, this study investigated the learning behaviours of health professionals within Fundamentals of Clinical Trials, a MOOC offered by edX. Thirty-five semi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed to explore how the design of this MOOC supported professional learning to occur. The study highlights a mismatch between learning intentions and learning behaviour of professional learners in this course. While the learners are motivated to participate by specific role challenges, their learning effort is ultimately focused on completing course tasks and assignments. The study found little evidence of professional learners routinely relating the course content to their job role or work tasks, and little impact of the course on practice. This study adds to the overall understanding of learning in MOOCs and provides additional empirical data to a nascent research field. The findings provide an insight into how professional learning could be integrated with formal, online learning.Keywords | MOOC · · professional learning: self-regulated learning |
ISSN | 1492-3831 |
Other number | 5 |
Refereed | Yes |
Rights | by/4.0 |
URL | http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1855 |
Other information | IRRODL |
Export options | BibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar |
AVAILABLE FILES
Viewed by 102 distinct readers
CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS
The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.
Click a star to be the first to rate this document
▶ POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS
Massive open online courses: A traditional or transformative approach to learning
Vale, Katie; Littlejohn, Allison; Littlejohn, Allison; Pegler, Chris
This chapter examines potential benefits and limitations of MOOCs, using a case example of a major MOOC initiative:edX. This chapter begins by examining conflicting perspectives around MOOCs from the literature. Then ...
Match: Littlejohn, Allison; MOOC
Why study on a MOOC? The motives of students and professionals
Milligan, Colin; Littlejohn, Allison
Massive Open Online Courses have emerged as a popular mechanism for independent learners to acquire new knowledge and skills; however, the challenge of learning online without dedicated tutor support requires learners ...
Match: Milligan, Colin; Littlejohn, Allison
Open, lifewide learning: A vision
Littlejohn, Allison; Falconer, Isobel; McGill, Lou; Littlejohn, Allison; Pegler, Chris
Match: Littlejohn, Allison
Patterns of engagement in connectivist MOOCs
Milligan, Colin; Littlejohn, Allison; Margaryan, Anoush
Connectivist massive open online courses (cMOOCs) represent an important new pedagogical approach ideally suited to the network age. However, little is known about how the learning experience afforded by cMOOCs is ...
Match: Milligan, Colin; Littlejohn, Allison;
Designing for quality?
Littlejohn, Allison; Hood, Nina
There are significant complexities in interpreting and measuring quality in MOOCs. In this chapter, we examine experts' perceptions of how to measure quality in MOOCs, using empirical data we gathered through ...
Match: Littlejohn, Allison; MOOC
Massive numbers, diverse learning
Littlejohn, Allison; Hood, Nina
MOOCs provide education for millions of people worldwide. Though it is not clear whether everyone can learn in a MOOC. Building on the typology of MOOC participants introduced is in Chap. 3 , and we explore the claim ...
Match: Littlejohn, Allison; MOOC
Quality in MOOCs: Surveying the terrain
Hood, Nina; Littlejohn, Allison
The purpose of this review is to identify quality measures and to highlight some of the tensions surrounding notions of quality, as well as the need for new ways of thinking about and approaching quality in MOOCs. It ...
Match: Littlejohn, Allison; MOOC
Learning challenges in higher education: An analysis of contradictions within Open Educational Practice
Kaatrakoski, Heli; Littlejohn, Allison; Hood, Nina
Open education, including the use of open educational resources (OER) and the adoption of open education practice, has the potential to challenge educators to change their practice in fundamental ways. This paper forms ...
Match: Littlejohn, Allison
MOOC Quality: The need for new measures
Hood, Nina; Littlejohn, Allison
MOOCs are re-operationalising traditional concepts in education. While they draw on elements of existing educational and learning models, they represent a new approach to instruction and learning. The challenges MOOCs ...
Match: Littlejohn, Allison
JISC/HE Academy OER Programme: Phase 3 synthesis and evaluation report
McGill, Lou; Falconer, Isobel; Littlejohn, Allison; Beetham, H.
The JISC/HE Academy OER Phase 3 programme (October 2011- October 2012) was designed to build on the sustainable practice identified in the first two stages (Pilot programme, and Phase 2 programme), and to expand in new ...
Match: Littlejohn, Allison