The OER Knowledge Cloud makes use of cookies. By continuing, you consent to this use. More information.
Beyond objective testing and peer assessment: Alternative ways of assessment in MOOCs
del Sánchez-Vera, María Mar and Prendes-Espinosa, María Paz

Translated titleMás allá de las pruebas objetivas y la evaluación por pares: alternativas de evaluación en los MOOC
PublishedJanuary 2015
JournalRUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 119-131
Original PublicationRevista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento
CountrySpain

ABSTRACT
MOOCs (massive open online courses) are an online teaching proposal that, in their short lives, have already thrown up two very different possibilities: cMOOCs and xMOOCs. Both are analysed in this paper from the perspective of assessing students’ learning. While assessment in xMOOCs is usually limited to multiple choice tests and sometimes delivering tasks, in cMOOCs the aim is to foster interaction from an educational standpoint, usually on the basis of peer assessment. Pedagogically, both models have their limitations. Multiple choice tests are mainly content bound while peer assessment has its own difficulties and drawbacks, which we explain here. We will put forward some useful ideas to give more flexibility to assessment in MOOCs (groups of experts, semantic web, portfolio, learning analytics), in an attempt to address educational assessment not as an end in itself but as another part of the educational process.

Los MOOC (cursos masivos abiertos en línea) son una propuesta de enseñanza en línea que en su corta vida han mostrado ya dos posibilidades bien diferenciadas, los cMOOC y los xMOOC. Ambas son analizadas en este artículo desde la perspectiva de la evaluación de los aprendizajes de los alumnos, pues mientras que en los xMOOC la evaluación suele aparecer reducida a pruebas tipo test o en algunos casos a la entrega de tareas, en los cMOOC la evaluación pretende promover la interacción desde una perspectiva de evaluación formativa y suele sustentarse en la evaluación por pares. Ambos modelos pueden resultar limitados desde una perspectiva pedagógica. Por una parte, los exámenes tipo test se circunscriben principalmente al contenido y, por otro lado, la evaluación por pares tiene también dificultades e inconvenientes que explicamos en el artículo. Así, en este artículo presentamos diversas alternativas útiles para flexibilizar las posibilidades de evaluación en los MOOC (grupos de expertos, web semántica, portafolio, analíticas de aprendizaje), intentando abordar la evaluación educativa no como una finalidad en sí misma, sino como una parte más del proceso educativo.

Keywords assessment · e-learning · evaluación · feedback

Published atBarcelona
ISSN1698-580X
RefereedYes
Rightsby/3.0/es/deed.en
DOI10.7238/rusc.v12i1.2262
Other informationRUSC. Univ. and Know. Soc.
Export optionsBibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar



AVAILABLE FILES
English version 2262-9327-1-PB.pdf · 526.6KB37 downloads
Spanish version 2262-9328-1-PB.pdf · 570.3KB30 downloads



Viewed by 99 distinct readers




CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS

The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.

Click a star to be the first to rate this document


POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS

Presentation to UNCTAD's advisory group on "Developing skills, knowledge and capacities through innovation: E-Learning, M-Learning, cloud-Learning"
Downes, Stephen
Match: assessment; e-learning

MOOCs in Europe: Overview of papers representing a collective European response on MOOCs as presented during the HOME conference in Rome November 2015
Bang, Joergen; Dalsgaard, Christian; Kjaer, Arne; O’Donovan, Maria; et al.
Table of contents Foreword Part 1: Regional MOOC initiatives Building OOC layers on top of existing courses (M)OOCs in Iceland: Language and learning communities EduOpen network in Italy Part 2: Role media ...
Match: assessment; e-learning

Re-purposing an OER for the online language course: a case study of Deutsch Interaktiv by the Deutsche Welle
Dixon, Edward M.; Hondo, Junko
This paper will describe pedagogical approaches for re-purposing an open educational resource (OER) designed and produced by the Deutsche Welle. This free online program, Deutsch Interaktiv, consists of authentic ...
Match: assessment; feedback

An ontology for open rubric exchange on the web
Panulla, Brian; Kohler, Megan
While the Internet has given educators access to a steady supply of Open Educational Resources, the educational rubrics commonly shared on the Web are generally in the form of static, non-semantic presentational ...
Match: assessment

Developing a strategic approach to MOOCs
Ferguson, Rebecca; Scanlon, Eileen; Harris, Lisa
During the last eight years, interest in massive open online courses (MOOCs) has grown fast and continuously worldwide. Universities that had never engaged with open or online learning have begun to run courses in these ...
Match: assessment

Development of OERs through international collaboration E-QUAL case study
Gupta, Parul
Development of Open Education Resources (OER) is similar to product development and it requires due attention to get the final product. Generally, the focus is laid on the final product and not on the process. However, ...
Match: assessment

Peer-to-peer recognition of learning in open education
Schmidt, Jan Philipp; Geith, Christine; Håklev, Stian; Thierstein, Joel
Recognition in education is the acknowledgment of learning achievements. Accreditation is certification of such recognition by an institution, an organization, a government, a community, etc. There are a number of ...
Match: assessment

MOOCS: What The Open University research tells us
Ferguson, Rebecca; Coughlan, Tim; Herodotou, Christothea
This quality enhancement report recommends priority areas for university activity in relation to massive open online courses (MOOCs). It does this by bringing together all The Open University’s published research work ...
Match: assessment

Marking Open and Affordable Courses: Best Practices and Case Studies
Ainsworth, Breeman; Allen, Nicole; Dai, Jessica; Elder, Abbey; et al.
This collaboratively authored guide helps institutions navigate the uncharted waters of tagging course material as open educational resources (OER) or under a low-cost threshold by summarizing relevant state ...
Match: assessment

Open recognition and its enemies (2) — No informal learning without informal recognition
Ravet, Serge
Match: assessment