Evaluation of free platforms for delivery of massive open online courses (MOOCs)
Published | January 2017 |
Journal | Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 166 - 181 |
Country | Turkey, Europe |
ABSTRACT
For the hosting, management and delivery of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) it is necessary a technological infrastructure that supports it. Various educational institutions do not have or do not wish to invest in such a structure, possibly because MOOCs are not yet part of official programs of universities, but initiatives by a particular teacher or a research group. Focusing on this problem, this study seeks to identify platforms that make it possible to create, host and provide courses free of charges for the offeror; find in the respective literature, the basic requirements for MOOC platforms and to evaluate the platforms based on the raised requirements. In order to identify the platforms, information was sought in scientific articles and websites dealing with the comparison of platforms and listing the existing MOOC providers. For the definition of evaluation requirements, there was a search in the Web of Science and Scopus databases, looking for the term "Massive Open Online Courses". After applying some filters, 62 works that address platforms and technology were selected for analysis. As a result there is the identification of six platforms that allow the free supply of courses, the proposal for 14 requirements for reviewing them and a frame containing the evaluation of the identified platforms. This assessment is important since it brings knowledge as a basis for selecting a platform that is the most suitable one in terms of the chosen structure and method to store, manage and deliver courses in MOOC format.Keywords | free platforms · MOOC · MOOC platforms · requirements |
Published at | Eskişehir |
ISSN | 1302-6488 |
Refereed | Yes |
Rights | by-nc-sa/4.0 |
DOI | 10.17718/tojde.285814 |
URL | http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/makale_goster.php?id=1289 |
Other information | TOJDE |
Export options | BibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar |
AVAILABLE FILES
Viewed by 194 distinct readers
CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS
The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.










Click a star to be the first to rate this document
▶ POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS
Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies
Means, Barb; Toyama, Yukie; Murphy, Robert; Bakia, Marianne; U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development
A systematic search of the research literature from 1996 through July 2008 identified more than a thousand empirical studies of online learning. Analysts screened these studies to find those that (a) contrasted an ...
Match: evaluation
Enhanced peer assessment in MOOC evaluation Through assignment and review analysis
Alcarria, Ramón; Bordel, Borja; de Andrés, Diego Martín; Robles, Tomás
The rapid evolution of MOOCs in recent years has produced a change in the education of students and in the development of professional skills. There is an increasing pressure on universities to establish procedures for ...
Match: evaluation; mooc
The infrastructure of openness: Results from a multi-institutional survey on OER platforms
Nyland, Rob
The purpose of this study is to understand how higher education institutions are selecting and using technology platforms for the creation and delivery of Open Educational Resources (OER). A survey about OER technology ...
Match: evaluation; platforms
The Online Interface and Social Inclusion: A MOOC Study in Turkey
Meri-Yilan, Serpil
One of the virtues of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) is that, because of their scalability, temporal flexibility and digital mediation, they have the potential to increase learner numbers in higher education, ...
Match: mooc; turkey
OERu context evaluation
Murphy, Angela
A survey was developed and launched in May and June 2012 to assess the extent to which OERu members are ready for participating in the pilot of the OERu model and determine which challenges organisations are currently ...
Match: evaluation
Evaluation criteria for interactive e-books for open and distance learning
Bozkurt, Aras; Bozkaya, Mujgan; McGreal, Rory; Conrad, Dianne
The aim of this mixed method study is to identify evaluation criteria for interactive e-books. To find answers for the research questions of the study, both quantitative and qualitative data were collected through a ...
Match: evaluation
Construction of MOOC platforms in China
Zheng, Qinhua; Chen, Li; Burgos, Daniel
MOOC platforms in China have achieved quite some scale in China with its development since 2012. Built either by universities or enterprises on their own, or by regional coalitions or school–enterprise partnerships, ...
Match: platforms; mooc
Meaningful learner information for MOOC instructors examined through a contextualized evaluation framework
Douglas, Kerrie; Zielinski, Mitchell; Merzdorf, Hillary; Diefes-Dux, Heidi; Bermel, Peter
Improving STEM MOOC evaluation requires an understanding of the current state of STEM MOOC evaluation, as perceived by all stakeholders. To this end, we investigated what kinds of information STEM MOOC instructors ...
Match: evaluation
OERRH evaluation framework
Perryman, L -A.
The OERRH Evaluation Framework provides guidelines that allow project processes, outputs and outcomes to be evaluated in ways appropriate to the individual concerns of the various work packages, while at the same time ...
Match: evaluation
Evaluation of Student Feedback Within a MOOC Using Sentiment Analysis and Target Groups
Lundqvist, Karsten Ø.; Liyanagunawardena, Tharindu; Starkey, Louise
Many course designers trying to evaluate the experience of participants in a MOOC will find it difficult to track and analyse the online actions and interactions of students because there may be thousands of learners ...
Match: evaluation; mooc