The OER Knowledge Cloud makes use of cookies. By continuing, you consent to this use. More information.
Weekly predicting the at-risk MOOC learners using dominance-based rough set approach
Bouzayane, Sarra and Saad, Inès

PublishedMay 2017
Conference5th European MOOCs Stakeholders Summit, EMOOCs 2017, Madrid, Spain, May 22-26, 2017, Digital Education: Out to the World and Back to the Campus
SeriesLecture Notes in Computer Science
Edition 1, Volume 10254, Pages 160-169
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
EditorsKloos, Carlos Delgado · Jermann, Patrick · Pérez-Sanagustín, Mar · Seaton, Daniel T. · White, Su
CountrySpain, Europe

ABSTRACT
This paper proposes a method based on the Dominance-based Rough Set Approach (DRSA) to predict the learners who are likely to drop out the course during the next week of the MOOC (Massive Open Online Course) based on their demographic and dynamic data of the previous week. These are called "At-risk Learners''. This method consists in two phases: the first aims at inferring a preference model while the second consists of classifying each learner either in the decision class Cl1 of "At-risk Learners'' or in the decision class Cl2 of "Active Learners'' based on the previously inferred preference model. The first phase is made of three steps: the first is to identify assignment examples of learners, the second is to construct a coherent criteria family for the learners' profiles characterization and the third is to infer a preference model resulting in a set of decision rules. The two phases should be weekly implemented throughout the MOOC broadcast. This method has been validated on real data of a French MOOC proposed by a Business School in France.

Keywords dominance-based Rough Set Approach · multicriteria decision making · prediction · “At-risk Learner” preference model

Published atMadrid
ISBN978-3-319-59044-8
RefereedYes
Rights© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
DOI10.1007/978-3-319-59044-8_18
URLhttps://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-59044-8_18
Export optionsBibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar


Viewed by 109 distinct readers




CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS

The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.

Click a star to be the first to rate this document


POST A COMMENT
RECENT RECORDS

Elementary STEM Teachers' Open Educational Resources and TPACK in a Professional Learning Network: A Case Study
Park, Yujin; Moon, Jewoong; Na, Hunhui
There has been growing attention on investigating elementary STEM teachers' Professional Learning Networks (PLNs). However, what types of Open Educational Resources (OER) and Technological, Pedagogical, and Content ...
Posted March 2, 2025

Creative Commons response to the UK Consultation on Copyright and Artificial Intelligence
Creative Commons
Creative Commons is pleased to respond to the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, and Department for Culture, Media and Sport’s open consultation on ...
Posted March 1, 2025

Judicious AI Use to Improve Existing OER
Kimmons, Royce; Veletsianos, George; Trust, Torrey
As the practical value and ethics of using generative artificial intelligence (AI) in education receive focused attention, open educational resources (OER) provide a mechanism toward an AI future that is more bright and ...
Posted March 1, 2025

Bibliometric Insights Into the Open Education Landscape
Zou, Rong; Jiang, Leilei; Wider, Walton
This bibliometric analysis explores the rapidly growing field of open education, offering insight into its nature and the wide range of academic topics it covers. This study applies co-citation and co-word analyses ...
Posted March 1, 2025

Open Textbooks at St. Cloud University: A Collective Case Study
Lundeen-Hoff, Sally
This starred paper offers a review of existing literature about open educational resources (OER), describes the methodology selected to research OER use at St. Cloud State University, outlines the results of a ...
Posted February 14, 2025

Analyzing the discourse on open educational resources on Twitter: a sentiment analysis approach
Bhagat, Kaushal Kumar; Mishra, Sanjaya; Parida, Ashis Kumar; Samal, Alyal; Lampropoulos, Georgios; Dixit, Alakh
This study investigated the sentiment of Twitter discourse on Open Educational Resources (OER). We collected 124,126 tweets containing hashtags related to OER posted from January 2017 to December 2021. We performed ...
Posted February 14, 2025

Individualisiertes Lernen mit digitalen Bildungsressourcen
Pietrusky, Stefan; Kalz, Marco
Ziel dieser Studie ist die Entwicklung eines Konzepts für die einheitliche Gestaltung digitaler Bildungsressourcen anhand verbindlicher Kriterien zur Förderung individualisierten Lernens im Unterricht. Während die ...
Posted February 9, 2025

Innovation with Open Educational Resources: An integrative review of drivers, barriers and enablers
Farrow, Robert; Iniesto, Francisco; Pitt, Beck; Weller, Martin; Bossu, Carina
Open Educational Resources (OER) are frequently interpreted as supporting educational innovations across a range of delivery styles. However, the mechanisms for OER innovation are underexplored in the scientific ...
Posted January 30, 2025

Identifying the Factors Affecting Student Academic Performance and Engagement Prediction in MOOC using Deep Learning: A Systematic Literature Review
Rizwan, Shahzad; Nee, Chee Ken; Garfan, Salem
The increasing reliance on Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) has transformed the landscape of education, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, where e-learning became essential. However, the effectiveness of ...
Posted January 29, 2025

Dubai Declaration on Open Educational Resources (OER)
UNESCO
Emerging technologies, including AI, provide opportunities to advance the 2019 Recommendation. Beyond the creation of new openly licensed content, potential applications include: facilitating the detection of existing ...
Posted January 2, 2025