Evaluating the validity and applicability of automated essay scoring in two massive open online courses
Published | November 2014 |
Type of work | Special Issue: Research into Massive Open Online Courses |
Journal | The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages 83-98 |
Original Publication | The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning |
Editors | McGreal, Rory and Conrad, Dianne |
ABSTRACT
The use of massive open online courses (MOOCs) to expand students’ access to higher education has raised questions regarding the extent to which this course model can provide and assess authentic, higher level student learning. In response to this need, MOOC platforms have begun utilizing automated essay scoring (AES) systems that allow students to engage in critical writing and free-response activities. However, there is a lack of research investigating the validity of such systems in MOOCs. This research examined the effectiveness of an AES tool to score writing assignments in two MOOCs. Results indicated that some significant differences existed between Instructor grading, AES-Holistic scores, and AES-Rubric Total scores within two MOOC courses. However, use of the AES system may still be useful given instructors’ assessment needs and intent. Findings from this research have implications for instructional technology administrators, educational designers, and instructors implementing AES learning activities in MOOC courses.Keywords | assessment · automated essay scoring systems · MOOC |
ISSN | 1492-3831 |
Other number | 5 |
Refereed | Yes |
Rights | by/4.0 |
URL | http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1857 |
Other information | IRRODL |
Export options | BibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar |
AVAILABLE FILES
Viewed by 134 distinct readers
CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS
The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.










Click a star to be the first to rate this document
▶ POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS
Global times call for global measures: Investigating automated essay scoring in linguistically-diverse MOOCs
Reilly, Erin; Wiliams, Kyle; Stafford, Rose; Corliss, Stephanie; et al.
This paper utilizes a case-study design to discuss global aspects of massive open online course (MOOC) assessment. Drawing from the literature on open-course models and linguistic gatekeeping in education, we position ...
Match: reilly, erin; stafford, rose; corliss, stephanie; assessment
Evaluating the strategic and leadership challenges of MOOCs
Marshall, Stephen J.
This paper presents an analysis of the strategic and leadership issues presented by the
range of massive open online courses (MOOCs) and associated activities happening
internationally. The analysis is framed by ...
Match: ; evaluating
CORRE: A framework for evaluating and transforming teaching materials into open educational resources
Nikoi, Samuel K.; Rowlett, Tania; Armellini, Alejandro; Witthaus, Gabi
Open education resources (OER) are taking centre-stage in many higher educational institutions globally, driven by the need to raise institutional profiles, improve the effectiveness of teaching and learning and achieve ...
Match: evaluating
Evaluating the effectiveness of adopting open educational resources in an introductory American government course
Lawrence, Christopher N.; Lester, Julie A.
In this article, we present findings from a grant-funded initiative to replace traditional, proprietary textbooks with an open content textbook under a Creative Commons license in the introductory American government ...
Match: evaluating
Lista de comprobación de calidad de un Recurso Educativo Abierto
Alberdi, Lola
Los docentes siempre han compartido sus recursos e ideas con los colegas de profesión, bien en forma de sencillos consejos y comentarios en la sala de profesores, compartiendo materiales educativos de referencia o ...
Match: evaluating
Not all rubrics are equal: A review of rubrics for evaluating the quality of Open Educational Resources
Yuan, Min; Recker, Mimi; McGreal, Rory; Conrad, Dianne
The rapid growth in Internet technologies has led to a proliferation in the number of Open Educational Resources (OER), making the evaluation of OER quality a pressing need. In response, a number of rubrics have been ...
Match: evaluating
Evaluating Open Educational Resources: Lessons learned
DeVries, Irwin
It was only ten years ago that MIT announced its OpenCourseWare initiative, and in 2012 the Paris Declaration on OER (Open Educational Resources) was announced by UNESCO. Over this decade, there has been a proliferation ...
Match: evaluating
Evaluating three different Open Educational Resource models provided to enable Learning in Our Connected World
Kursun, Engin; Wilson, Tina; McAndrew, Patrick; Cagiltay, Kursat
The swift advancement of Web technologies has provided real opportunities for improving access, transfer and sharing of knowledge and information. One of the outcomes facilitated by these technologies is the Open ...
Match: evaluating
Evaluating a professional development cMOOC: Mosomelt
Cochrane, Thomas; Narayan, Vickel; Barker, Sandy; Dawson, Shane; et al.
This paper focuses upon the evaluation stages of the design and implementation of a lecturer professional development cMOOC embedded within an educational design-based research methodology. In the design and development ...
Match: evaluating
Evaluating NTU’s OpenCourseWare project with Google analytics: User characteristics, course preferences, and usage patterns
Sheu, Feng-Ru; Shih, Meilun
As freely adoptable digital resources, OpenCourseWare (OCW) have become a prominent form of Open Educational Resources (OER). More than 275 institutions in the worldwide OCW consortium have committed to creating free ...
Match: evaluating