Beyond objective testing and peer assessment: Alternative ways of assessment in MOOCs
Translated title | Más allá de las pruebas objetivas y la evaluación por pares: alternativas de evaluación en los MOOC |
Published | January 2015 |
Journal | RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 119-131 |
Original Publication | Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento |
Country | Spain |
ABSTRACT
MOOCs (massive open online courses) are an online teaching proposal that, in their short lives, have already thrown up two very different possibilities: cMOOCs and xMOOCs. Both are analysed in this paper from the perspective of assessing students’ learning. While assessment in xMOOCs is usually limited to multiple choice tests and sometimes delivering tasks, in cMOOCs the aim is to foster interaction from an educational standpoint, usually on the basis of peer assessment. Pedagogically, both models have their limitations. Multiple choice tests are mainly content bound while peer assessment has its own difficulties and drawbacks, which we explain here. We will put forward some useful ideas to give more flexibility to assessment in MOOCs (groups of experts, semantic web, portfolio, learning analytics), in an attempt to address educational assessment not as an end in itself but as another part of the educational process.Los MOOC (cursos masivos abiertos en línea) son una propuesta de enseñanza en línea que en su corta vida han mostrado ya dos posibilidades bien diferenciadas, los cMOOC y los xMOOC. Ambas son analizadas en este artículo desde la perspectiva de la evaluación de los aprendizajes de los alumnos, pues mientras que en los xMOOC la evaluación suele aparecer reducida a pruebas tipo test o en algunos casos a la entrega de tareas, en los cMOOC la evaluación pretende promover la interacción desde una perspectiva de evaluación formativa y suele sustentarse en la evaluación por pares. Ambos modelos pueden resultar limitados desde una perspectiva pedagógica. Por una parte, los exámenes tipo test se circunscriben principalmente al contenido y, por otro lado, la evaluación por pares tiene también dificultades e inconvenientes que explicamos en el artículo. Así, en este artículo presentamos diversas alternativas útiles para flexibilizar las posibilidades de evaluación en los MOOC (grupos de expertos, web semántica, portafolio, analíticas de aprendizaje), intentando abordar la evaluación educativa no como una finalidad en sí misma, sino como una parte más del proceso educativo.
Keywords | assessment · e-learning · evaluación · feedback |
Published at | Barcelona |
ISSN | 1698-580X |
Refereed | Yes |
Rights | by/3.0/es/deed.en |
DOI | 10.7238/rusc.v12i1.2262 |
Other information | RUSC. Univ. and Know. Soc. |
Export options | BibTex · EndNote · Tagged XML · Google Scholar |
AVAILABLE FILES
Viewed by 102 distinct readers
CLOUD COMMUNITY REVIEWS
The evaluations below represent the judgements of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Cloud editors.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e054/0e0540ce5230bd4920e068cec3737d71c56b2855" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e054/0e0540ce5230bd4920e068cec3737d71c56b2855" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e054/0e0540ce5230bd4920e068cec3737d71c56b2855" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e054/0e0540ce5230bd4920e068cec3737d71c56b2855" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e054/0e0540ce5230bd4920e068cec3737d71c56b2855" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e054/0e0540ce5230bd4920e068cec3737d71c56b2855" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e054/0e0540ce5230bd4920e068cec3737d71c56b2855" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e054/0e0540ce5230bd4920e068cec3737d71c56b2855" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e054/0e0540ce5230bd4920e068cec3737d71c56b2855" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e054/0e0540ce5230bd4920e068cec3737d71c56b2855" alt=""
Click a star to be the first to rate this document
▶ POST A COMMENT
SIMILAR RECORDS
Presentation to UNCTAD's advisory group on "Developing skills, knowledge and capacities through innovation: E-Learning, M-Learning, cloud-Learning"
Downes, Stephen
Match: assessment; e-learning
MOOCs in Europe: Overview of papers representing a collective European response on MOOCs as presented during the HOME conference in Rome November 2015
Bang, Joergen; Dalsgaard, Christian; Kjaer, Arne; O’Donovan, Maria; et al.
Table of contents
Foreword
Part 1: Regional MOOC initiatives
Building OOC layers on top of existing courses
(M)OOCs in Iceland: Language and learning communities
EduOpen network in Italy
Part 2: Role media ...
Match: assessment; e-learning
Re-purposing an OER for the online language course: a case study of Deutsch Interaktiv by the Deutsche Welle
Dixon, Edward M.; Hondo, Junko
This paper will describe pedagogical approaches for re-purposing an open educational resource (OER) designed and produced by the Deutsche Welle. This free online program, Deutsch Interaktiv, consists of authentic ...
Match: assessment; feedback
Evaluating the validity and applicability of automated essay scoring in two massive open online courses
Reilly, Erin; Stafford, Rose; Williams, Kyle; Corliss, Stephanie; et al.
The use of massive open online courses (MOOCs) to expand students’ access to higher education has raised questions regarding the extent to which this course model can provide and assess authentic, higher level student ...
Match: assessment
Special Issue: Open Facilitator Stories
Singh, Lenandlar; Nerantzi, Chrissi; Spiers, Alex; Cullen, Rod; et al.
Welcome to the Open Facilitator Project…
We are a team of open educators passionate about enhancing the learner and facilitator experience in open educational offers of different sizes, small, large or extra large. ...
Match: assessment
Unpacking MOOC scholarly discourse: A review of nascent MOOC scholarship
Ebben, Maureen; Murphy, Julien S.
The rapid rise of MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses) signals a shift in the ways in which digital teaching and learning are engaged in and understood. Drawing upon a comprehensive search of nine leading academic ...
Match: assessment
MOOCS: What The Open University research tells us
Ferguson, Rebecca; Coughlan, Tim; Herodotou, Christothea
This quality enhancement report recommends priority areas for university activity in relation to massive open online courses (MOOCs). It does this by bringing together all The Open University’s published research work ...
Match: assessment
Peer-to-peer recognition of learning in open education
Schmidt, Jan Philipp; Geith, Christine; Håklev, Stian; Thierstein, Joel
Recognition in education is the acknowledgment of learning achievements. Accreditation is certification of such recognition by an institution, an organization, a government, a community, etc. There are a number of ...
Match: assessment
Flexible paths to assessment for OER learners: A comparative study
Conrad, Dianne; McGreal, Rory
This paper highlights the preliminary findings of a one-year research project (2011) that investigated the fit of recognizing prior learning (RPL) practice and related assessment and transfer protocols to projected OER ...
Match: assessment
Assessment challenges in open learning: Way-finding, fork in the road, or end of the line?
Conrad, Dianne
Growing global commitments to open learning through the use of Open Educational Resources (OERs) are accompanied by concerns over what “to do” with that learning when learners present it to traditional institutions ...
Match: assessment